Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Black People...After 1776 - By Dr. Leroy Vaughn, MD, MBA, Historian

by DR. LEROY VAUGHN, MD, MBA, HISTORIAN is now available on amazon.com.



AFTER 1776

SLAVE CHILDREN OF THOMAS JEFFERSON

PAUL CUFFEE

DAVID WALKER

RICHARD ALLEN AND THE A. M. E. CHURCH

WAR OF 1812

THE JOHN BROWN TEST

BLACK PEOPLE OF THE OLD WEST

BLACK WOMEN OF THE OLD WEST

AFRICAN AMERICANS AND THE CIVIL WAR
.



SLAVE CHILDREN OF THOMAS JEFFERSON

In the 1860 census in the South, there were 500,000 mulatto or mixed race slaves and 350,000 slave owners. Thus, every slave owner had on average produced more than one slave child. The slave children of former President Thomas Jefferson, and their direct descendants, are among the most carefully studied families in the history of America because of their outstanding achievements up to and including Chairman of the Board of DuPont Chemical Corporation.
Thomas Jefferson is considered the greatest and most brilliant statesman this country has ever produced. Moreover, among the founding fathers, he was the one who was the most vocal opponent of slavery and did the most to contribute to its abolition. He wrote the Declaration of Independence with a clause opposing slavery, which was taken out at the insistence of the other signers. He wrote the Northwest Ordinance in 1783, and included a clause that prohibited slavery in the new areas of Ohio, Indiana, and Illinois. Jefferson negotiated the Louisiana Purchase from France in 1803, and included a provision, which prohibited the introduction of slavery into these new areas. While president, Thomas Jefferson pushed through Congress a bill in 1808, which prohibited the importation of slaves and authorized the U.S. Navy to seize and confiscate ships containing slaves on the high seas. Thomas Jefferson was married to Martha Wayles, the daughter of John Wayles, for 10 years before she died in 1776. Upon the death of Martha Wayles and her father, Jefferson inherited 11,000 acres of land and 135 slaves. Sally Hemmings was one of the slaves inherited. She was also a daughter of John Wayles and an African slave, and thus his wife's half sister. Jefferson fell in love with this mulatto slave after she accompanied his daughter to France, where he was U.S. Ambassador in 1787. Their first son "Tom" was born in 1789. Sally Hemmings produced Beverly Hemmings in 1798, while Thomas Jefferson was Vice President, and three other children while Jefferson was President, including Harriet in 1801, Madison in 1805, and Eston in 1808.
Beverly and Harriet Hemmings were allowed to run away in 1822. Harriet married a White person and never acknowledged her parents. Beverly ended up in England where he also passed for White. His great-grandson, Edward Graham Jefferson, migrated back to the U.S. and became a naturalized American citizen. He subsequently became CEO of DuPont Chemical Corporation, retiring in 1986 and was a member of the Board at AT&T Corporation, Chemical Bank, and Seagram Corporation.
Sally Hemming's first son, Tom, eventually married Jemima, the slave daughter of a master named Drury Woodson, and changed his name to Tom Woodson. He became the distributor of an abolitionist newspaper and a leader in the Black community. Federal Judge Timothy Lewis in 1991, became the first prominent person to admit publicly that he was a descendant of Sally Hemmings and son, Tom Woodson. This was only after his Senate confirmation hearings. Most descendants were ashamed of their slave ancestry.
Frederick Madison Roberts, the grandson of Madison Hemmings, became the first Black man ever elected to the State Assembly of California. He also became a close friend of Earl Warren and helped found UCLA, that is, the University of California at Los Angeles. Sally Hemming's last born son, Eston, had a son named John Wayles Jefferson who founded the Continental Cotton Company, which was very successful.
Thomas Jefferson was the most vocal opponent against slavery and spent his entire life working for the abolition of slavery. He strongly believed that “all men are created equal” and that they could achieve equally if only given the opportunity. Jefferson would be proud to know that his slave children confirmed his theory about racial equality by their outstanding achievements.

SLAVE CHILDREN OF THOMAS JEFFERSON BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adler, D. (1987) Thomas Jefferson: Father of Our Democracy. New York: Holiday House.
Bakhufu, A. (1993) The Six Black Presidents. Washington, D.C.: PIK2 Publications.
Bear, J. & Betts, E. (1987) Thomas Jefferson’s Farm Book, University Press of Virginia.
Bennett, L. (1988) Before the Mayflower. New York: Penguin Books.
Brodie, F. (1974) Thomas Jefferson, An Intimate History. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Erickson, E. (1974) Dimensions of a New Identity: Jefferson Lectures. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Jefferson, I. (1951) Memoirs of a Monticello Slave. University of Virginia
Kane, J. (1981) Facts About the Presidents: From Geo. Wash. to Ronald Reagan. NY: H. W. Wilson Co.
Malone, D. (1981) Jefferson and His Times: The Sage of Monticello. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
Mapp, A. (1987) Thomas Jefferson: A Strange Case of Mistaken Identity: New York: Madison Books.
Reuter, E. (1969) The Mulatto in the United States. Haskell House.
Sloan, S. (1992) The Slave Children of Thomas Jefferson. Berkeley: The Orsden Press.
Sullivan, M. (1991) Presidential Passions: Love Affairs of Am’s Pres. - Wash. - John. NY: Shapolsky Pub.
Tinsell, C. (1964) The Secret Loves of the Founding Fathers. New York: Devin-Adair Co.


PAUL CUFFEE

America’s Richest African American
Paul Cuffee (1759-1817) was the richest African American in the United States during the early 1800’s, but never stopped championing the cause of better conditions for his people. At the age of 19, he sued the Massachusetts courts for the right to vote stating that taxation without representation should be illegal. He built on his own farm, New Bedford’s only school for the children of “free Negroes” and personally sponsored their teachers. He authored the first document of its kind addressed to the New Jersey Legislature asking that body “to petition the Congress of the United States that every slave be freed and that every Colored man that so desired be allowed to leave America.” By 1811, Paul Cuffee finally concluded that if the richest Black person in America was considered a second class citizen, then emigration back to Africa was the only answer for Black social, economic, and political self-determination. On December 12, 1815 Cuffee personally sponsored and transported nine families (38 people) back to Africa in what he hoped would be the first of many such voyages.
Paul Cuffee was one of ten children born to a slave father, Saiz Kufu (later, Cuffee) and an Indian mother. The father was freed by his Quaker master in 1745, and earned enough money working for ship owners to buy a 116-acre farm in Dartmouth, Mass. in 1766. Paul left the farming to his siblings and chose a maritime life and by age 14 was working full time on whaling ships. By age 18, he had become so thoroughly self-taught in mathematics, navigation, and other seafaring skills that he decided to built his own boat for self-employment. During the Revolutionary War, he made enough money smuggling goods pass British blockade patrol ships that he was able to purchase a shipyard and construct three small whaling boats between 1787 and 1795. During one season alone, Cuffee and his crew captured six whales and Cuffee proved his courage and commitment by asking his crew to lower him to the side of the boat where he personally harpooned two whales.
Paul Cuffee’s early activity was fraught with danger as he purchased and delivered freight along the Atlantic seaboard. Pirates were a constant threat and on more than one occasion his ship was captured and all of his merchandise stolen, but he never stopped pursuing his dream. The Fugitive Slave Act was also a constant threat, especially since Cuffee exclusively staffed his businesses and ships with Blacks to demonstrate their equality and to reinforce their self-confidence and sense of racial pride. The Fugitive Slave Act legalized the seizure of any Black person suspected of escape from slavery by any White person. Since African Americans could not testify in court, “the Black accused would have to find and persuade a White person to appear at his trial and convince the authorities that the accused was free” or risk being resold into slavery. Moreover, Paul Cuffee was once arrested for several days and his boat seized during a delivery to Vienna, Maryland by Federal Collector of Customs, James Frazier. In 1796, Maryland had passed a law “requiring any ‘suspicious’ free Black to six months of servitude.” Since a vessel owned and operated by Blacks was unprecedented, it was certainly “suspicious”. Whites were also concerned about what this demonstration of Black achievement might have on otherwise obedient slaves. However, Cuffee had “impeccable mercantile credentials, proof of registry at Bedford, Massachusetts, and receipts from such reliable merchant houses as William Rotch and Sons.”
As the Cuffee commercial enterprises continued to prosper, he expanded by purchasing a 200-acre farm, a gristmill, and by building ships large enough to enable him to purchase and deliver freight internationally. In 1800 Cuffee built the 162-ton “Hero” which sailed around Africa’s Cape of Good Hope eight times while delivering merchandise from Portuguese East Africa to Europe. Paul Cuffee’s largest ship was the 268-ton “Alpha” which Cuffee and nine Black crewmembers sailed from Savannah, Georgia to Gothenburg, Sweden with a large cargo in 1806.
Despite the fact that Paul Cuffee was the richest Black man and largest Black employer in America, he was convinced that no amount of wealth would make a Black man socially acceptable in America and that Blacks would always be “resident aliens.” He felt the only answer was to develop a strong Black African nation. Cuffee declared: “Blacks would be better off in Africa, where we could rise to be a people.” When William Rotch told him of a British program to repatriate unwanted Blacks living in London to Sierra Leone, he immediately sailed to England for more information.
Cuffee hoped that a strong Black nation could trade with Great Britain and the United States and that educated “free Negroes” from America could provide the much needed technology. American technology was needed because a British law (1731) forbid any White person from teaching any Black person a trade, thus reducing London’s “Black Poor” to unemployable beggars whom the government wanted sent to Africa.
While traveling to England and Sierra Leone, Paul Cuffee used an introductory letter from President Thomas Jefferson to help him gather data on manufacturing, operating costs, threatening colonial practices, and available trade opportunities. Cuffee found the residents of Sierra Leone very receptive to his prescription for reviving Black industry. They also hoped that a strong economic and social return of Africa to its past glory would help dissuade the slave trade. A large percentage of the population of Freetown were former American slaves who had fought with the British during the Revolutionary War and then were evacuated to Nova Scotia, Canada with the White British Loyalists. Both severe racism and severe climate encouraged the Black Nova Scotians to leave en-mass for Sierra Leone in November 1792. Paul Cuffee hired Aaron Richards, a Black settler in Freetown as the captain’s apprentice “to prepare the road to progress,” and before leaving, Cuffee founded the “Friendly Society for the Emigration of Free Negroes from America”. After his return to America, “Cuffee began a speaking tour to introduce free Blacks to the notion of nation building in Africa.”
The War of 1812 interrupted Cuffee’s trade and emigration plans until 1815, at which time he paid $4,000 from personal funds to transport 38 African Americans to Sierra Leone, and he successfully secured homesteads for all of his Black American brethren at his expense. Failing health prevented any future trips and Cuffee died on September 9, 1817. Paul Cuffee’s legacy is not as a wealthy Black man but as a wealthy Black man who fought for the betterment of his people and was always willing to back his convictions with self-sacrifice, discipline, determination, and financial resources.

PAUL CUFFEE BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, R. (1969) Great Negroes: Past and Present. Chicago: Afro-Am Publishing Co. Inc.
Al-Mansour, K. (1993) Betrayal by Any Other Name. San Francisco: The First African Arabian Press.
Appiah, K. & Gates, H. (eds.) (1999) Africana. New York: Basis Civitas Books.
Aptheker, H. (1951) A Documentary History of the Negro People in the US: NY: Macmillan Pub. Co.
Aptheker, H. (1968) To Be Free. New York: International Publishers
Asante, M. & Mattson, M. (1991) Historical & Cultural Atlas of African Ams. Nzzzzy: Macmillan Pub. Co.
Bennett, L. (1975) The Shaping of Black America. Chicago: Johnson Publishing Co.
Bennett, L. (1988) Before the Mayflower. New York: Penguin Books.
Franklin, J. (1988) From Slavery to Freedom: A History of Negro Americans. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
McIntyre, C. (1992) Criminalizing a Race: Free Blacks During Slavery. Queens, NY: Kayode Publications.


DAVID WALKER

In 1829, David Walker published the first of four articles that he called “Walker’s Appeal.” In it he encouraged all slaves to become free by killing their masters. The South exploded in anger and offered a reward for Walker of $10,000 dead or alive. Laws were passed threatening to hang anyone with “Walker’s Appeal” in their possession. Anti-slavery leaders of both races in the North and South rejected the violence advocated in Walker’s publication and forced him to circulate it at his own risk and expense.
David Walker proclaimed to the slaves: “…it is no more harm for you to kill the man who is trying to kill you than it is for you to take a drink of water.” Walker hated slavery despite the fact that he was born free as the product of a free mother and slave father. Afraid that his stirring publication meant eminent danger, Walker’s wife and friends urged him to flee to Canada but he refused. Walker said: “I will stand my ground. Somebody must die in this cause. I may be doomed to the stake and the fire or to the scaffold tree, but it is not in me to falter if I can promote the work of emancipation.”
Despite the great efforts of both the North and South to stop its publication, “Walker’s Appeal” became one of the most widely read and circulated books ever written by a Black person. David Walker was considered a hero by most abolitionists, who considered his book the boldest attack ever written against slavery.
Although the violent aspects of Walker’s Appeal are most emphasized, he also offered Whites an olive branch if they would end slavery: “Treat us like men, and there is no danger but we will all live in peace and happiness together. For we are not like you: hard hearted, unmerciful, and unforgiving. What a happy country this will be if Whites will listen.” Walker viewed his publication as a religious document giving Blacks an obligation from God to eradicate the evils of slavery. Walker said: “…answer God Almighty, had you not rather be killed than to be a slave to a tyrant who takes the life of your mother, wife, and children?”
He told the White slaveholders: “You may do your best to keep us in wretchedness and misery to enrich you and your children, but God will deliver us from under you.”
David Walker was born in Wilmington, North Carolina on September 28, 1785. He was self-taught and read extensively the literature on slavery - especially on the history of resistance and oppression. In 1820, he moved to Boston, Massachusetts where he opened a second hand clothing store. He began writing for a Black newspaper called “The Freedom Journal” in 1827.
David Walker published “Walker’s Appeal” on September 28, 1829. The full title is “Walker’s Appeal in Four Articles: Together with a Preamble, to the Coloured Citizens of the World, but in Particular, and Very Expressly, to Those of the United States of America". Walker created such fear among slaveholding states that governors and city officials alike held emergency meetings to deal with its obvious implications. True to his word, Walker did not flee the country and was murdered in 1830. The “Appeal” was the inspiration for several slave rebellions including the terrifying slave rebellion of Nat Turner about one year after Walker’s death.
David Walker’s selfless devotion to the liberation of his people and his revolutionary spirit also served as an important model for future militants like Henry Highland Garnet who published Walker’s “Appeal” and his own work entitled “Address to the Slaves of the United States” in a single volume in 1848.

From David Walker's Appeal—ARTICLE I
OUR WRETCHEDNESS IN CONSEQUENCE OF SLAVERY

MY BELOVED BRETHREN: THE INDIANS OF NORTH AND OF SOUTH AMERICA-THE GREEKS-THE IRISH, SUBJECTED UNDER THE KING OF GREAT BRITAIN-THE JEWS, THAT ANCIENT PEOPLE OF THE LORD-THE INHABITANTS OF THE ISLANDS OF THE SEA-IN FINE, ALL THE INHABITANTS OF THE EARTH, (EXCEPT HOWEVER, THE SONS OF AFRICA) ARE CALLED MEN, AND OF COURSE ARE, AND OUGHT TO BE FREE. BUT WE, (COLOURED PEOPLE) AND OUR CHILDREN ARE BRUTES!! AND OF COURSE ARE, AND OUGHT TO BE SLAVES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AND THEIR CHILDREN FOREVER!! TO DIG THEIR MINES AND WORK THEIR FARMS; AND THUS GO ON ENRICHING THEM, FROM ONE GENERA­TION TO ANOTHER WITH OUR BLOOD AND OUR TEARS!!!!
I PROMISED IN A PRECEDING PAGE TO DEMONSTRATE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE MOST INCREDULOUS, THAT WE, (COLOURED PEOPLE OF THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA) ARE THE MOST WRETCHED, DEGRADED AND AB­JECT SET OF BEINGS THAT EVER LIVED SINCE THE WORLD BEGAN, AND THAT THE WHITE AMERICANS HAVING REDUCED US TO THE WRETCHED STATE OF SLAVERY, TREAT US IN THAT CONDITION MORE CRUEL (THEY BEING AN ENLIGHTENED AND CHRISTIAN PEOPLE,) THAN ANY HEATHEN NATION DID ANY PEOPLE WHOM IT HAD REDUCED TO OUR CONDITION. THESE AFFIRMATIONS ARE SO WELL CONFIRMED IN THE MINDS OF ALL UNPREJUDICED MEN, WHO HAVE TAKEN THE TROUBLE TO READ HISTORIES, THAT THEY NEED NO ELUCIDATION FROM ME. BUT TO PUT THEM BEYOND ALL DOUBT, I REFER YOU IN THE FIRST PLACE TO THE CHILDREN OF [OLD TESTAMENT HEBREW PATRI­ARCH] JACOB, OR OF ISRAEL IN EGYPT, UNDER [EGYPTIAN KING] PHARAOH AND HIS PEOPLE. SOME OF MY BRETHREN DO NOT KNOW WHO PHARAOH AND THE EGYPTIANS WERE-I KNOW IT TO BE A FACT, THAT SOME OF THEM TAKE THE EGYPTIANS TO HAVE BEEN A GANG OF DEVILS, NOT KNOWING ANY BETTER, AND THAT THEY (EGYPTIANS) HAVING GOT POSSESSION OF THE LORD'S PEOPLE, TREATED THEM NEARLY AS CRUEL AS CHRISTIAN AMERICANS DO US, AT THE PRESENT DAY. FOR THE INFORMATION OF SUCH, I WOULD ONLY MENTION THAT THE EGYPTIANS, WERE AFRICANS OR COLOURED PEOPLE, SUCH AS WE ARE-SOME OF THEM YELLOW AND OTHERS DARK-A MIXTURE OF ETHIOPIANS AND THE NATIVES OF EGYPT-ABOUT THE SAME AS YOU SEE THE COLOURED PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE PRESENT DAY…..


FUGITIVE SLAVE ACT
APPROVED, SEPTEMBER 18, 1850—SECTION 6
And be it further enacted, That when a person held to service or labor in any State or Territory of the United States, has heretofore or shall hereafter escape into another State or Territory of the United States, the person or persons to whom such service or labor may be due, or his, her, or their agent or attorney, duly authorized, by power of attorney, in writing, acknowledged and certified under the seal of some legal officer or court of the State or Territory in which the same may be executed, may pursue and reclaim such fugitive person, either by procuring a warrant from some one of the courts, judges, or commissioners aforesaid, of the proper circuit, district, or county, for the apprehension of such fugitive from service or labor, or by seizing and arresting such fugitive, where the same can be done without process, and by taking, or causing such person to be taken, forthwith before such court, judge, or commissioner, whose duty it shall be to hear and determine the case of such claimant in a summary manner; and upon satisfactory proof being made, by deposition or affidavit, in writing, to be taken and certified by such court, judge, or commissioner, or by other satisfactory testimony, duly taken and certified by some court, magistrate, justice of the peace, or other legal officer authorized to administer an oath and take depositions under the laws of the State or Territory from which such person owing service or labor may have escaped, with a certificate of such magistracy or other authority, as aforesaid, with the seal of the proper court or officer thereto attached, which seal shall be sufficient to establish the competency of the proof, and with proof, also by affidavit, of the identity of the person whose service or labor is claimed to be due as aforesaid, that the person so arrested does in fact owe service or labor to the person or persons claiming him or her, in the State or Territory from which such fugitive may have escaped as aforesaid, and that said person escaped, to make out and deliver to such claimant, his or her agent or attorney, a certificate setting forth the substantial facts as to the service or labor due from such fugitive to the claimant, and of his or her escape from the State or Territory in which he or she was arrested, with authority to such claimant, or his or her agent or attorney, to use such reasonable force and restraint as may be necessary, under the circumstances of the case, to take and remove such fugitive person back to the State or Territory whence he or she may have escaped as aforesaid. In no trial or hearing under this act shall the testimony of such alleged fugitive be admitted in evidence; and the certificates in this and the first [fourth] section mentioned, shall be conclusive of the right of the person or persons in whose favor granted, to remove such fugitive to the State or Territory from which he escaped, and shall prevent all molestation of such person or persons by any process issued by any court, judge, magistrate, or other person whomsoever.


DAVID WALKER BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, R. (1969) Great Negroes: Past and Present. Chicago: Afro-Am Publishing Co. Inc.
Al-Mansour, K. (1993) Betrayal by Any Other Name. San Francisco: The First African Arabian Press.
Appiah, K. & Gates, H. (eds.) (1999) Africana. New York: Basis Civitas Books.
Aptheker, H. (1951) A Documentary History of the Negro People in the United States. NY: Citadel Press.
Aptheker, H. (1968) To Be Free. New York: International Publishers.
Bennett, L. (1975) The Shaping of Black America. Chicago: Johnson Publishing Co.
Bennett, L. (1988) Before the Mayflower. New York: Penguin Books.
Franklin, J. (1988) From Slavery to Freedom: A History of Negro Americans. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Litwack, L. & Meier, A. (1988) Black Leaders of the Nineteenth Century. Chicago: Univ. of Illinois Press.
Low, A. & Clift, V. (eds.) (1983) Encyclopedia of Black America. New York: Neil Schuman Publishers.
McIntyre, C. (1992) Criminalizing a Race: Free Blacks During Slavery. Queens, NY: Kayode Publications
Sally C. (1993) The Black 100. New York: Carol Publishing Group.
Wiltse, C (ed.) (1965) David Walker’s Appeal. New York: Hill & Wang.
Zinn, H. (1980) A People’s History of the United States. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.


RICHARD ALLEN AND THE A. M. E. CHURCH

The African Methodist Episcopal Church (A. M. E. Church) was one of the first Black organizations dedicated to Black self-improvement and Pan-Africanist ideals.

The A. M. E. Church was also distinguished by its commitment to political agitation,Black education, and social activism. The interest in education initially culminated in the founding of Wilberforce University in 1863, as the first Black college founded by Blacks. Numerous other A. M. E. Colleges soon followed. A. M. E. pastors were also responsible for numerous lawsuits against public school segregation, which eventually led to the 1954 case: “Brown vs. Board of Education.” During the Civil Rights movement, the A. M. E. Church was very active, and in addition to a pragmatic gospel, the church addressed the housing, welfare, and unionization issues of new immigrants to northern cities. However, nothing more completely captures the spirit and embodiment of the A. M. E. Church than its founder and first bishop, Richard Allen.
Richard Allen was born into slavery in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on February 14, 1760 and shortly thereafter his entire family was sold by a Philadelphia lawyer, Benjamin Chew, to a Delaware plantation owner, Stokely Sturgis. Although the slave master was unconverted, he allowed Richard Allen to attend Methodist meetings. In addition to their antislavery beliefs, Allen was especially impressed by their emphasis on a simple set of virtues including honesty, modesty, and sobriety and converted to Methodism at age 17. By age 20, Allen was able to convert his slave master and to convince him that slaveholding was wrong. Allen was allowed to buy his freedom for $2,000 by working a variety of odd jobs over the next five years. Once freed, “Allen traveled widely on the Methodist circuits, preaching, holding prayer meetings, and giving religious counsel to groups of White and Black Christians in the small towns and rural settlements of Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and New York.” While in Philadelphia, Allen was asked by the elders at St. George Methodist Church to preach to their Black members. After the Black membership increased dramatically, Richard Allen determined that his calling was to minister to the “uneducated, poor, and un-churched community” and that he could best reach them in a separate Black church. However, the White Methodist elders ridiculed the whole idea with “very degrading and insulting language.”
St. George’s Black membership became so large that the church was forced to build a new seating gallery. When church authorities demanded that Blacks sit in the rear of the gallery, Allen and others decided they had been insulted enough: “We all went out of the church in a body and they were no more plagued with us.” The Black Methodists agreed to purchase a blacksmith shop and to move it to a lot Allen had purchased with his own savings. Carpenters were hired to make the building suitable for church meetings and on April 9, 1794, Bishop Asbury dedicated the structure as “Bethel African Church.” Bishop Asbury also ordained Allen as the first Black Methodist deacon and within four years the Bethel membership increased from 45 to 457 members. Richard Allen’s success was the inspiration for many other Black Methodist groups to form African Methodist Churches throughout the Northeast especially in New York, Delaware, and Maryland.
Since Bethel African Church was still under White Methodist ecclesiastical jurisdiction, White Methodists sued for legal control of Bethel, but in 1807 the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled in Allen’s favor. In 1816, Allen organized a national convention of Black Methodists, since many of them had similar White Methodist challenges. The convention delegates resolved that the churches they represent “should become one body under the name ‘African Methodist Episcopal Church’ in order to secure their privileges and promote union and harmony among themselves.” Richard Allen became the new denomination’s first Bishop and retained that title until his death in 1831.
Richard Allen dedicated his entire life toward uplifting his fellow African Americans. He felt that true Christians had to stretch out their hands beyond the circle of family and friends “to comfort the poor neighbor, the stranger, the widow, and the orphan.” He helped establish the Free African Society, the Bethel Benevolent Society, and the African Society for the Education of Youth “in order to support one another…from a love to the people of our complexion whom we behold with sorrow.” Bethel Church became the scene of numerous Black conventions to discuss the abolition of slavery and racial discrimination, and Richard Allen was commonly recognized as the leader of free Northern Blacks. Allen also published “An Address to Those Who Keep Slaves” in which he attacked slavery and the arguments for it.
Allen spent the final years of his life vehemently opposing the American Colonization Society, which Whites organized in 1817 to support the emigration of free Blacks from America to Africa. The American Colonization Society argued that free Blacks would have to leave this country to find true freedom, since the Fugitive Slave Act allowed any White person to call a free Black a fugitive slave. Since African Americans could not testify in court and therefore could not defend themselves, they had to find someone White who could speak in their behalf or they would become enslaved. Richard Allen himself was once called a fugitive slave, but fortunately, he was so famous that he not only won his case but had his accuser thrown into jail for three months. The American Colonization Society also argued that African Americans could help civilize and convert their less fortunate African brothers. However, Allen angrily responded that American Blacks could not convert or civilize anyone since they were mostly illiterate and uneducated themselves. He felt the real purpose of the colonizationists was to expel the most vociferous opponents of slavery. Allen told the American Colonization Society: “We will never separate ourselves voluntarily from the slave population in this country; they are our brethren and we feel there is more virtue in suffering privations with them than fancied advantage for a season.”
Richard Allen propelled the A. M. E. Church to the center of Black institutional activity during his lifetime. Allen’s life, as much as his sermons, remained an effective example for the future leadership of the A. M. E. Church. Moreover, his leadership direction is responsible for the continued proliferation of A. M. E. membership throughout the 19th and 20th century, which today has more than 3,000,000 million members world wide.
RICHARD ALLEN AND THE A. M. E. CHURCH BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, R. (1969) Great Negroes: Past and Present. Chicago: Afro-Am Publishing Co., Inc.
Appiah, K. & Gates, H. (eds.) (1999) Africana, New York: Basis Civitas Books.
Aptheker, H. (1951) A Documentary History of the Negro People in the United States. NY: Citidel Press.
Asante, M. & Mattson, M. (1991) Historical & Cultural Atlas of African Ams. NY: Macmillan Pub. Co.
Bennett, L. (1975) The Shaping of Black America. Chicago: Johnson Publishing Co.
Bennett, L. (1988) Before the Mayflower. New York: Penguin Books.
Franklin, J. (1988) From Slavery to Freedom: A History of Negro Americans. NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
Handy, J. (1902) Scraps of African Methodist Episcopal History. Philadelphia: A. M. E. Book Concern.
Litwack, L. & Meter, A. (1988) Black Leaders of the 19th Century. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Low, A. & Clift, V. (eds.) (1983) Encyclopedia of Black America. New York: Neil Schuman Publishers.
MyIntyre, C. (1992) Criminalizing a Race: Free Blacks During Slavery.
Sally, C. (1993) The Black 100. New York: Carol Publishing Group.
Wesley, C. (1935) Richard Allen: Apostle of Freedom. Washington, DC.


WAR OF 1812

African American soldiers and sailors played a tremendous role in helping America defeat the British during the Revolutionary War. Most northern states were so grateful for the contributions of Black soldiers that they abolished slavery shortly after the war. Even Virginia passed a law freeing all slaves who had participated in the Revolutionary War. However, peacetime produced a total amnesia to the contributions of Blacks in the military and a request for their participation was not made again until the War of 1812 (June 18, 1812-December 24, 1814).
After the Revolutionary War, southerners were determined to never again allow African Americans, neither free nor slave, to “gain dignity and prestige by fighting for the United States.” They were instrumental in the passage by Congress of the Military Act (May 8, 1792), which called for the enrollment of “each and every able-bodied White male citizen between the ages of 18 and 45.” When the Marine Corps was established by a congressional act on July 11, 1798, Secretary of War Henry Knox issued a directive that “No Negro, mulatto, or Indian is to be enlisted,” and this directive was followed for the next 150 years. Only World War II manpower shortages forced the Marine Corps to change its 150-year policy and recruit African Americans. Secretary of the Navy Benjamin Stoddert followed the lead of the Army and Marine Corps and instructed his recruiters in August 1798 “…no Negroes, mulattos, or Indians.”
During the early 1800s, the British had the most powerful Navy in the world, especially after defeating France’s Napoleonic Navy. Still at war with Napoleon, a British naval blockade from Maine to Georgia was used to prevent American trading with French merchants. Moreover, because of a tremendous shortage of sailors, the British not only boarded and searched merchant vessels on the high seas but would frequently claim that American sailors were British deserters and force them to work on British ships (called impressment).
The impressment of three African American sailors from the American frigate “Chesapeake” on June 22, 1807 is called the first major incident leading to the War of 1812, and is frequently compared to the killing of Crispus Attucks which was called the first major incident leading to the Revolutionary War.
A group of expansionist congressmen called “War Hawks” convinced President James Madison to sign a declaration of war against Great Britain on June 18, 1812. In addition to conquering the British on the high seas, they hoped to expel the British from Canada, since most British troops were still fighting Napoleon. However, extreme racism left America ill prepared for this unpopular war. Not only did White men fail to enlist, but New England Whites also started a separatist movement and held a convention in Hartford, Connecticut in December 1814 to further solidify their demands. Moreover, the Canadian invasion was a total failure, and the British continued to defeat American Whites until they occupied Detroit and most of Ohio. J. A. Rogers states that the British practically wiped out American sea-borne trade and captured Florida and much of the South with Black volunteers whom they promised freedom. On August 24, 1814 the British Army captured Washington D.C. and burned many public buildings to the ground including the White House and Capital. The Encyclopedia Britannica says America was thoroughly defeated in this war while gaining none of the avowed aims and that only legend has converted defeat into the illusion of victory. Military historian Gary Donaldson states that only after the United States was brought to the edge of losing its independence were African Americans allowed in the military.
White residents of both Pennsylvania and New York now welcomed Blacks into the military to defend their cities from the advancing enemy and even promised slaves freedom after three years of service. General Andrew Jackson begged Blacks in New Orleans to fight the British and promised them equal pay with Whites, 160 acres of land, and participation in all Black battalions led by Black officers to avoid White prejudices. Jackson said: “Through a mistake in policy, you have heretofore been deprived of participation in the glorious struggle for national rights in which our country is engaged. This no longer shall exist. As Americans, your country looks with confidence to her adopted children for a valorous support.”
On March 3, 1813 the Navy officially authorized the recruitment of Blacks because of the severe manpower shortage, thus reversing their official exclusion since the congressional act of 1798. Experienced Black sailors who had previously worked on whaling boats and as merchant marines flocked to the Navy and were credited with much of America’s success in defeating the British Navy in the Great Lakes region. Commodore Thomas McDonough said the accuracy of his Black gunners was responsible for his victory on Lake Champlain. Commodore Isaac Chancey said he had fifty Black crewmembers that were among his very best.
On September 10, 1813, Commodore Oliver Perry defeated the British fleet on Lake Erie after a savage three hour battle and acknowledged the contributions and individual bravery of his 100 Black seamen in his Battle Report and also noted: “They seemed to be absolutely insensitive to danger.” Military historian Michael Lanning states: “The American naval victories in which Black sailors played such a critical role, finally forced the war-weary British to agree to a peace treaty.” The “Treaty of Ghent” was signed on December 24, 1814 in Belgium restoring pre-war conditions.
Unaware that the war had ended, sixty British ships containing 12,000 men sailed up the Mississippi River on January 8, 1815 in an attempt to capture New Orleans. The men of the “Louisiana Battalion of Free Men of Color” were in the front line of American soldiers who dealt the British their worst defeat of the war, inflicting 4,000 casualties compared to only sixty of their own. After the battle, General Andrew Jackson praised the Black soldiers: “I was not ignorant that you possessed qualities most formidable to an invading enemy…the President of the United States shall hear how praise worthy was your conduct in the hour of danger.” Jackson kept his promises of $124 and 160 acres of land to both White and Black soldiers. However, glory faded quickly for the “Louisiana Battalion of Free Men of Color”; they were soon disbanded and again faced pre-war prejudices. In city celebrations of the “Battle of New Orleans” for the next 100 years, not a single Black person was allowed to participate in the festivities.
White America, again, quickly forgot the contributions of Blacks in the military. A War Department memorandum on March 3, 1815 discharged all Blacks from the military stating: “A Negro is deemed unfit to associate with the American soldier.” The Navy issued orders in 1839 restricting Black enlistments to less than 5% and only in positions of cooks, mess boys, and servants, and this was signed by the same Isaac Chauncey who had highly praised his Black sailors during the War of 1812. Peacetime again became the chief promoter of racial exclusion in America and as always, when African Americans were no longer needed, they were also no longer wanted.
WAR OF 1812 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Donaldson, G. (1991) History of African-Americans in the Military. Malabar, FL. Krieger Pub. Co.
Foner, J. (1974) Blacks and the Military in American History. New York: A New Perspective Pub. Co.
Greene, R. (1974) Black Defenders of America: 1775-1973. Chicago: Johnson Publishing.
Langley, H. (1967) Social Reforms in the US Navy: 1798-1862. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
McConnell, R. (1968) Negro Troops of Antebellum Louisiana.. Baton Rouge, LA: LA State Univ. Press.
Moebs, T. (1994) Black Soldiers Black Sailors Black Ink….. Chesapeake Bay, MD: Moebs Publishing Co.
Mullen, R. (1973) Blacks in America’s Wars. New York: Pathfinder.
Nalty, B. (1986) Strength for the Fight: A History of Black Americans in the Military.
Rogers, J. (1989) Africa’s Gift to America. St. Petersburg, FL: Helga Rogers Publishing
Wilson, J. (1977) The Black Phalanx: A History of the Negro Soldier ... Wars of 1775-1812, 1861-1865
Zinn, H. (1980) A People’s History of the United States. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.


THE JOHN BROWN TEST

Dr. Leonard Jeffries recommends that before you call a White person a “true friend,” that person should pass the “John Brown Test.” Since history records numerous John Browns the question is, exactly which John Brown does Dr. Jeffries consider a good role model for White friendship? Rhode Island College changed its name to Brown University in 1804 to honor one person named John Brown. However, this John Brown made his fortune exchanging rum for slaves, so he couldn’t possibly be the White friend role model. John Robert Brown (1909-1993) was Chief Justice for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and played a pivotal role in championing and enforcing civil rights legislation in the South. He is most noted for ordering in 1962 that African-American James Meredith be enrolled in the all-White University of Mississippi. Most Black people would be happy to have a White friend like John Robert Brown, but Leonard Jeffries says the “real” John Brown died at Harper’s Ferry, West Virginia in 1859.
The “real” John Brown had an entire book written about him in 1909 by W. E. Burghardt DuBois which was reprinted in 1996 by International Publishers. One of the greatest women in African American history, Harriet Tubman, regarded this John Brown and not President Abraham Lincoln as the true emancipator of her people.
The “real” John Brown was born in Torrington, Connecticut on May 9, 1800 about four months before the attempted insurrection of slaves under Gabriel in Virginia in September of the same year. He was raised in Hudson, Ohio where his family migrated in 1805. By the age of 16, he had already joined the church and soon became such an experienced bible student that “when any person was reading he would correct the least mistake.” His love for religion was exceeded only by his love for family where he fathered 20 well-disciplined, hard-working children. After seven of his children died before adulthood, he concluded that in some way his own sin and shortcomings were bringing upon him “the vengeful punishment of God.” He felt his greatest sin was not doing enough “to increase the amount of human happiness.”
In 1839, a turning point occurred in Brown’s life when he was visited by a Black preacher named Fayette. Fayette described slavery as “the foulest and filthiest blot on 19th century civilization.” He added: “as a school of brutality and human suffering, of female prostitution and male debauchery; as a mockery of marriage and defilement of family life; as a darkening of reason, and spiritual death, slavery has no parallel.” John Brown fell to his knees and “implored God’s blessing on his purpose to make active war on slavery, and he bound his family in solemn and secret compact to labor for emancipation.”
John Brown was convinced that the first step toward emancipation was education. He noted that all pro-slavery states were vehemently opposed to educating slaves and made this a capital offense. John was also aware that slaveholders actively pursued African American schools and churches and burned them to the ground after Nate Turner’s slave revolt on August 21, 1831. Brown felt that once the master-slave relationship was broken, Black people deserved their own state and educated Blacks would be needed for self-government. He actively campaigned for the establishment of African American schools and even tried to establish a school himself in Hudson, Ohio. When Oberlin College opened its doors to “Negroes” in 1839, and appointed his father as a trustee, John Brown was overjoyed.
On August 1, 1846, Gerrit Smith, a wealthy New York abolition leader, offered free Blacks 100,000 acres of his land in North Elba, New York for farms. Because of the bleak climate and harsh soil, Black farmers found it very difficult to succeed until John Brown volunteered to help. He went to Gerrit Smith at Petersboro, New York in April 1848 and said: “I am something of a pioneer…I will take one of your farms myself, clean it up and plant it, and show my Colored neighbors how such work should be done. I will look after them in all needful ways and be a kind of father to them.”
In 1854, the government announced that Kansas would become a slave-free state open for settlement. Consequently, five of Brown’s sons moved to Kansas in October 1854 but were appalled at what they discovered. Large pro-slavery gangs were traveling throughout Kansas killing anti-slavery farmers and burning their properties. When John Brown’s sons informed him what was happening, he loaded a wagon full of weapons and headed for Kansas. In May 1856, shortly after John Brown’s arrival in Kansas, two thousand pro-slavery Missourians surrounded Lawrence, Kansas, the capital city, and brutally killed many of the anti-slavery settlers and sacked and burned half the town. On the same day, Senator Brooks killed Senator Charles Sumner by a crushing blow to the head in the U.S. Senate Chamber for telling the truth about Kansas. John Brown was angry and “indignant that there had been no resistance; that Lawrence was not defended; and denounced the men as trembling cowards, or worse.” In retaliation, Brown and his sons entered Missouri at night and dragged five of the pro-slavery ringleaders out of their cabins and hacked them to death with swords. This blow, called the Pottawatomie Murders, is said to have freed Kansas by plunging it into civil war, and compelling men to fight for freedom, which they had vainly hoped to gain by political diplomacy. Kansas’s anti-slavery settlers repelled Missouri’s pro-slavery settlers’ last invasion on September 15, 1856, and Kansas was finally declared a slave-free state. John Brown was now free to return to the East to resume his plan to free southern slaves by force.
Between 1857 and 1859, John Brown visited the homes of Frederick Douglas, Harriet Tubman (pictured left), Henry Highland Garnet, Martin Delaney, and many other leading African American abolitionists to gain their support for his plan to free all southern slaves by force. All of the abolitionists were extremely impressed by John Brown’s intense desire to end slavery. Although they believed in John Brown, most did not believe his plan was humanly possible. Nevertheless, only sickness prevented Harriet Tubman from joining John Brown on his southern invasion after she had actively recruited soldiers for his cause.
When told that he might die executing his plan, Brown exclaimed: “Did not my Master Jesus Christ come down from Heaven and sacrifice Himself upon the altar for the salvation of the race, and should I, a worm, not worthy to crawl under his feet, refuse to sacrifice myself?” On October 16, 1859, John Brown with an armed band of 16 Whites (including 2 of his sons) and 5 Blacks attacked the federal armory at Harper’s Ferry, West Virginia. He had hoped that by capturing the armory arsenal, escaped slaves would join his rebellion, forming an “army of emancipation” with which to liberate their fellow slaves. Unfortunately, he was surrounded by U.S. Marines and overpowered. He was tried and convicted of slave insurrection and hanged on December 2, 1859. Many believe that Brown’s attack helped immortalize him and hasten the Civil War, which did bring emancipation.
If Leonard Jeffries could find a single friend, Black or White, who even comes close to passing the “John Brown Test”, he should consider himself truly blessed. The truth is, only one person in this country’s history, either Black or White has ever passed the John Brown Test, and he was the “REAL” John Brown.

JOHN BROWN TEST BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aaron, D. (1973) The Unwritten War. New York: Oxford University Press.
Appiah, K. & Gates, H. (eds.) (1999) Africana. New York: Basis Civitas Books.
Aptheker, H. (1951) A Documentary History of the Negro People in the US. New York: Citadel Press.
Aptheker, H. (1969) American Negro Slave Revolts, New York: International Publishers.
Asante, M. & Mattson, M. (eds.) (1991) Historical & Cultural Atlas of Afr. Ams. NY Macmillan Pub. Co.
Bennett, L. (1988) Before the Mayflower. New York: Penguin Books.
DuBois, W. (1972) John Brown - New York: International Publishers.
Franklin, J. (1988) From Slavery to Freedom: A History of Negro Americans, NY Alfred A. Knopf.
Loewen, J. (1995) Lies My Teacher Told Me, New York: Simon & Schuster.
Low, A. & Clift, V. (eds.) (1983) Encyclopedia of Black America. New York: Neal Schuman Publishers.
Oates, S. (1970) To Purge This Land With Blood. New York: Harper & Row.
Scheidenhelm, R. (ed.) (1972) The Response to John Brown. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Stavis, B. (1970) John Brown: The Sword and the Word. New York: A.S. Barnes.
Warch, R & Fanton, J. (eds.) John Brown. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Zinn, H. (1980) A People’s History of the United States. New York HarperCollins Publishers.


BLACK PEOPLE OF THE OLD WEST

President Roosevelt called December 7, 1941, the day Pearl Harbor was bombed, as a day that will forever be recorded in infamy. For Black pioneers in the old west, February 2, 1848 will forever be recorded in infamy. This is the day the peace treaty was signed which ended the Mexican War and gave to the United States the territories of Texas, California, Nevada, Utah and parts of Arizona, Wyoming, Colorado, and New Mexico.
The African Americans who arrived with the earliest Spanish expeditions to California helped create a culture that accepted them as equals. Blacks purchased large segments of land and became successful businessmen with the establishment of hotels and trading centers. Los Angeles was founded by 26 people of African ancestry and only two Caucasians. Maria Rita Valdez, whose Black grandparents were among the founding members of Los Angeles, owned Rancho Rodeo de Las Aguas, today called Beverly Hills. Francisco Reyes, another Black resident, owned the San Fernando Valley. In the 1790's, he sold it and became mayor of Los Angeles. Pio Pico, whose grandmother was listed as mulatto in the 1790 census, was governor of California from 1845-1846 when the Mexican War started. Pico Boulevard in Los Angeles is named after this Black governor.
William Leidesdorff (pictured left) is one of San Francisco's most famous citizens. He was born in St. Croix, Virgin Islands to a Danish planter and his African wife. He sailed for California in 1841, after becoming a wealthy businessman, aboard his 160-ton schooner called "Julia Ann." He shortly thereafter became a landowner, having purchased a 35,000-acre estate in San Francisco and soon became treasurer of the San Francisco City Council. He helped set up the first public school system which was open to everyone, regardless of race, creed, or color. Leidesdorff opened the first hotel in San Francisco, introduced the first steamboat to the city, and organized its first horse race. Today a street in downtown San Francisco bears the name of this remarkable early Black citizen.
Things changed rapidly after February 2, 1848, when the United States assumed control of California. President Polk announced the discovery of gold in California in 1849, and the population soared ten fold within two years. Although racial lines had been ignored before California became American territory, Black hatred and discrimination moved westward with the White wagon trains. Most White Californians were convinced that no matter how honest, reliable, hard working or wealthy a Black neighbor might be, he ought not be granted any rights a White man was bound to respect. In 1852, the legislature of California passed a law, deeply hated by Blacks, which prohibited any Black person from testifying in court. This prevented Black men from supporting their land claims, Black women from identifying rape assailants, and Black businessmen from suing those who had cheated or robbed them. Other anti Black laws produced segregated schools and prohibited Blacks from voting as well as from serving in the military.
In addition, the Fugitive Slave Law was passed in 1852 by a 14 to 9 vote, which also permitted a slave owner to remain an indefinite time in the state, thus institutionalizing slavery despite its prohibition in the state constitution.
A Black exodus from California to Canada occurred in 1858, when the California legislature tried to pass a bill banning Black immigration. Blacks were terrified because Oregon's legislature passed a law the previous year, which provided for the expulsion of all Black people within three years. Any Black remaining after three years would be whipped every six months or forced into labor without pay. Oregon's exclusion provision was passed in 1857 and was not repealed until 1927.
Our Black ancestors in the old west could only dream about how wonderful their lives may have been if the Mexican government had won the war and had not signed the peace treaty on the infamous day of February 2, 1848.
BLACK PEOPLE OF THE OLD WEST BIBLIOGRAPHY
Appiah, K. & Gates, H. (eds.) (1999) Africana New York: Basis Civitas Books.
Aptheker, H. (1951) A Documentary History of the Negro People in the US. New York: Citadel Press.
Beasley, D. (1919) The Negro Trail Blazer of CA, Los Angeles: Times Mirror Printing and Binding House.
Billington, M. & Hardaway, R. (eds.) (1998) African Ams. on the West. Front. Niwot, CO: Univ. Pr. of CO
Graebner, N. (ed.) 1968) Manifest Destiny. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Jay, W. (1849) A Review of the Causes and Consequences of the Mexican War. Boston: B. B. Mussey & Co.
Katz, W. (1992) Black People Who Made the Old West, Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press
Lapp, R. (1977) Blacks in Gold Rush California. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
Pelz, R. (1989) Black Heroes of the Wild West. Seattle: Open Hand Publishers.
Ravage, J. (1997) Black Pioneers: Images of the Black Experience.. Salt Lake City: Univ. of Utah Press.
Savage, W. (1976) Blacks in the West. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Schroeder, J. (1973) Mr. Polk’s War: Am. Opposition and Dissent 1846-1848. Madison: Univ. of WI Press.
Smith, G. & Judah, C. (eds.) (1966) Chron. of the Gringos: U. S Army ... 1846-1848. Albuq.: Univ. of WI Pr.


BLACK WOMEN OF THE OLD WEST

Although our novels and movies are filled with heroes from the old west, African American heroes are virtually never mentioned. Moreover, historians have also contributed to this unjust and unbalanced recording of our glorious western saga by completely ignoring the many accomplishments of Black men and women, despite the fact they were accurately reported in newspapers, government records, military reports, and pioneer memoirs. As members of a double minority, Black women have suffered an even greater historical injustice, although they were an integral part of the western fabric. Nothing more clearly demonstrates the contributions of Black women to the western tradition than the biographies of Biddy Bridget Mason, Clara Brown, and Mary Ellen Pleasant.
Biddy Bridget Mason (1815-1891) was born into slavery and given as a wedding gift to a Mormon couple in Mississippi named Robert and Rebecca Smith. In 1847 at age 32, Biddy Mason was forced to walk from Mississippi to Utah tending cattle behind her master’s 300-wagon caravan. After four years in Salt Lake City, Smith took the group to a new Mormon settlement in San Bernardino, California in search of gold. When Biddy Mason discovered that the California State Constitution made slavery illegal, she had Robert Smith brought into court on a writ of habeas corpus, and the court freed all of Smith’s slaves. Now free, Mason and her three daughters (probably fathered by Smith) moved to Los Angeles where they worked and saved enough money to buy a house at 331 Spring Street in downtown Los Angeles.
Knowing what it meant to be oppressed and friendless, Biddy Mason immediately began a philanthropic career by opening her home to the poor, hungry, and homeless. Through hard work, saving, and investing carefully, she was able to purchase large amounts of real estate including a commercial building, which provided her with enough income to help build schools, hospitals, and churches. Her most noted accomplishment was the founding of First African Methodist Episcopal (A. M. E.) Church, now the oldest church in Los Angeles, where she also operated a nursery and food pantry. Moreover, her generosity and compassion included personally bringing home cooked meals to men in state prison. In 1988, Mayor Tom Bradley had a tombstone erected at her unmarked gravesite and November 16, 1989 was declared “Biddy Mason Day”. In addition, the highlights of her life were displayed on a wall of the Spring Center in downtown Los Angeles, an honor befitting Los Angeles’ first Black female property owner and philanthropist.
Clara Brown (1806-1888) is another who dedicated her life to the betterment of others. She was born as a slave in Virginia and then sold at age three to the Brown family in Logan, Kentucky. At age 35, her master died, and her slave husband, son, and daughter were sold at auction to different owners. After 20 additional years in slavery, she was able to buy her freedom and immediately headed west to St. Louis. At age 55, she agreed to serve as cook and laundress in exchange for free transportation in a caravan headed for the gold mines of Colorado. Clara Brown established a laundry in Central City and as her resources expanded, she opened up her home, which served as a hospital, church, and hotel to the town’s less fortunate.
Under her direction, the first Sunday school developed, and moreover, the whole town turned to her during illness because she was such a good nurse. Frequently, she even “grubstaked miners who had no other means of support while they looked for gold in the mountains and was repaid handsomely for her kindness and generosity by those who struck pay dirt.” Far and wide, she was known as “Aunt Clara” and as “the Angel of the Rockies”.
By the end of the Civil War, Clara Brown had accumulated several Colorado properties and over $10,000 in cash. Since slavery was over, she used her fortune to search for relatives in Virginia and Kentucky and returned with 34 of them including her daughter. She continued her philanthropy among the needy for the rest of her life and also spent large sums of money helping other Blacks come west. Upon her death at age 82, the Colorado Pioneers Association buried her with honors, and a plaque was placed in the St. James Methodist Church stating that her house was the first home of the church.
Mary Ellen Pleasant (1814-1903), a former slave, moved to San Francisco in 1849 where she opened a successful boarding house, famous for cards, liquor, and beautiful women. She was also a partner of Thomas Bell, cofounder of the first “Bank of California.” As a businesswoman, she was called mercurial, cunning, cynical, and calculating, but personally she was softhearted and had a passion for helping the less fortunate who called her “the Angel of the West”. She was a leader in California for the protection of abused women and children and helped build and support numerous “safe havens” for them. Mary Ellen Pleasant hated slavery and frequently rode into the rural sections of California to rescue people held in bondage. Because of Pleasant, the entire Black community of San Francisco received a warning from one judge for “the insolent, defiant, and dangerous way that they interfered with those who were arresting slaves.” Mary Ellen Pleasant used most of her fortune to aid fugitive slaves. “She fed them, found occupations for them, and financially backed them in numerous small businesses.” In 1858, she gave $30,000 to John Brown to help finance his raid at Harper’s Ferry, Virginia. This White abolitionist had hoped to capture the national armory and distribute the weapons to slaves for a massive insurrection. During the Civil War, Pleasant raised money for the Union cause and continued to fight for civil rights. Her tombstone epitaph read: “Mother of Civil Rights in California” and “Friend of John Brown”.
Brief biographies of Biddy Bridget Mason, Clara Brown, and Mary Ellen Pleasant serve to illustrate the enormous contributions and accomplishments of Black women in the old west. Era Bell Thompson in “American Daughter” clearly states the problem: “Black women were an integral part of the western and American tradition. It both impairs their sense of identity and unbalances the historical record to continue to overlook the role of Black women in the development of the American west.”

BLACK WOMEN OF THE OLD WEST BIBLIOGRAPHY
Billington, M & Hardaway, E. (eds.) (1998) African Ams on the West. Front. Niwot, CO: Univ. Pr. of CO.
Bruyn, K. (1970) Aunt Clara Brown: Story of a Black Pioneer - Boulder, CO: Pruett Publishing Co.
James, E. & James J. (eds.) (1971) Notable American Women. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
Katz, W. (1992) Black People Who Made the Old West, Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Lerner, G. (1979) The Majority Finds Its Past: Placing Women in History. NY: Oxford University Press.
Myres, S. (1982) Westering Women: The Frontier Experience. 1880-1915. Albuquerque: Univ. of NM Press.
Pelz, R. (1989) Black Heroes of the Wild West. Seattle: Open Hand Publishers.
Ravage, J. (1977) Black Pioneers: Images of the Black Experience….Salt Lake City: Univ. of Utah Press.
Riley, G. (1981) Frontierswomen: The Iowa Experience. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Savage, W. (1976) Blacks in the West. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Sterling, D. (1984) We Are Your Sisters: Black Women in the 19th Century. NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
Thompson, E. (1986) American Daughter. St. Paul: Minnesota Historical Society.

AFRICAN AMERICANS AND THE CIVIL WAR

In a 1928 biography of Ulysses S. Grant, historian W. E. Woodward disavowed any contributions made by Black Americans in the Civil War. He wrote: “The American Negroes are the only people in the history of the world, that ever became free without any effort of their own. The Civil War was not their business.” Woodward dismissed the 200,000 African Americans who served in the war and the 28,000 who died fighting. White historians have always diminished the wartime contributions of African Americans (who have served honorably in every war since this country’s inception), but no period seems more blatantly ignored than the Civil War. Freedom for Blacks was the lasting legacy of the Civil War, yet most history textbooks would have us believe that Black slaves sat around playing banjoes and awaiting Yankee soldiers to set them free. Nothing could be further from the truth!
The Civil War began on April 12, 1861 when the Confederate Army attacked Fort Sumter. The North initially thought they would easily crush the South because of their 23,000,000 able-bodied White males verses only about 6,000,000 White males available to the South. The North was so certain of victory that they absolutely refused to allow any Black people (free or slave) to participate. President Lincoln, however, had considerable difficulty in obtaining volunteers. Poor White men refused to fight in a war which, they believed, would liberate slaves who would take their jobs. They also felt that neither saving the Union nor ending slavery was adequate reason for risking their lives. In July 1862 President Lincoln asked for 300,000 men, but in five weeks less than 30,000 volunteered. On March 1, 1863, Congress passed the nation’s first draft bill, the National Conscription Act, which was so unpopular that anti-draft riots broke out in several northern cities. Primarily, recently immigrated poor White males vented their anger against local defenseless African Americans. The New York Times wrote that people of African descent were “literally hunted down like wild beasts and when caught either stoned to death or hung from trees and lamp posts.”
In addition to a manpower shortage, General Sherman told President Lincoln that “our men are not good soldiers. They brag but they don’t perform.” The New York World newspaper reported that “when the Confederate Calvary charged at Bull Run the Union soldiers ran in panic, leaving artillery, guns, ammunition, wagons, and equipment behind.” Sir William Howard Russell, war correspondent of the London Times wrote: “Such cowardly scandalous behavior on the part of soldiers I should never have considered possible.” The North was decisively defeated in its first three major battles at Bull Run, Wilson Creek, and Balls Bluff. Horace Greeley of the New York Tribute wrote Lincoln that “the larger part of the army is a confused mob, entirely demoralized.” He further added that Lincoln should “make peace with the rebels at once and on their terms.” Conceding victory to the Confederacy, Greeley published that “so short-lived has been the American Union that men who saw its rise may now see its fall.”
In July 1862, Lincoln convinced his Cabinet that all was lost unless he could “win over the slaves of the South and have them fight on his side by offering them freedom.” Lincoln himself wrote the original draft of the Emancipation Proclamation and called a special Cabinet meeting for its presentation. The Cabinet agreed that the proclamation was their last resort, but Secretary of War Seward asked Lincoln if he could wait for some type of Union victory prior to its release. Otherwise, Seward said: “It will be viewed as the last measure of an exhausted government; a cry for help; the government stretching forth its hands to Ethiopia, instead of Ethiopia stretching forth her hands to the government.” The opportunity came with the marginal Federal victory at Antietam Creek in Maryland on September 17, 1862. One week after the Battle of Antietam, Lincoln released the Emancipation Proclamation, which stated that all slaves in the Confederacy (or areas still in rebellion) would be “henceforth and forever free.” In addition, this document also permitted for the first time, the recruitment of Black men into the army. As a result of these actions, large numbers of newly emancipated slaves all over the South began joining Federal forces as soldiers and laborers.
When it became clear to the Confederate forces in 1863 that their armies would be facing Black soldiers in the field, they responded with a threat of death to all African Americans and their White commanding officers. These were not idle threats. At Fort Pillow, Tennessee in April 1864 about 300 Black Federal soldiers were massacred under the direction of Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest (who later founded the Ku Klux Klan). The Fort Pillow incident caused Black soldiers to fight more desperately throughout the remainder of the war. They either feared that capture meant certain death, or they intended to exact some revenge for the Fort Pillow atrocities or both.
On June 7, 1863 at Milliken’s Bend, Louisiana, the Ninth and Eleventh Louisiana regiments won the Civil War’s first significant battle secured by African Americans. Assistant Secretary of War Charles Dana reported that “a Confederate force of three thousand attacked the camp and initially forced the Negro troops to give way, but once reminded that those of their number who were captured were killed, they rallied with great fury and routed the enemy.”
Although the Louisiana regiments fought the first major battles by African American soldiers in the Civil War, the Fifty-Fourth Massachusetts regiment gained the most widespread and lasting fame of the war during its assault on Confederate Fort Wagner in South Carolina. Most of the men of the Fifty-Fourth regiment were killed while attacking Fort Wagner, yet northern politicians, newspapers, and military leaders hailed the Fifty-Fourth as a symbol of the country’s greatest example of valor in combat. In 1989, Hollywood honored the Fifty-Fourth regiment in a feature film entitled “Glory” which earned an Oscar nomination for best picture.
Black soldiers participated in virtually every major battle once they were allowed to join the military and earned 23 Congressional Metals of Honor. Senior Union commanders including Generals Daniel Ullman and Nathaniel Banks testified that “the brigades of Negroes behaved magnificently and fought splendidly, and they were far superior in discipline to the White troops and just as brave.” On August 15, 1864 in an interview with John T. Mills, Lincoln defended the use of Black troops by stating that if the 200,000 Black soldiers had decided to fight for the Confederacy instead of the Union, he would have been “compelled to abandon the war in three weeks.”
In summary, history textbooks should record that African American soldiers fought gallantly during the Civil War to end over 200 years of bondage. The Thirteenth Amendment (freeing all slaves) was only another testimony to the magnificent accomplishments of the Black soldiers on the Civil War’s battlefields.

THIRTEENTH AMENDMENT
Section 1.
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
Section 2.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.
The Emancipation Proclamation
January 1, 1863
By the President of the United States of America
A Proclamation
Whereas, on the twenty-second day of September, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-two, a proclamation was issued by the President of the United States, containing, among other things, the following, to wit:
"That on the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, all persons held as slaves within any State or designated part of a State, the people whereof shall then be in rebellion against the United States, shall be then, thenceforward, and forever free; and the Executive Government of the United States, including the military and naval authority thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of such persons, and will do no act or acts to repress such persons, or any of them, in any efforts they may make for their actual freedom.
That the Executive will, on the first day of January aforesaid, by proclamation, designate the States and parts of States, if any, in which the people thereof, respectively, shall then be in rebellion against the United States; and the fact that any State, or the people thereof, shall on that day be, in good faith, represented in the Congress of the United States by members chosen thereto at elections wherein a majority of the qualified voters of such State shall have participated, shall, in the absence of strong countervailing testimony, be deemed conclusive evidence that such State, and the people thereof, are not then in rebellion against the United States."
Now, therefore I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the power in me vested as Commander-in-Chief, of the Army and Navy of the United States in time of actual armed rebellion against the authority and government of the United States, and as a fit and necessary war measure for suppressing said rebellion, do, on this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and in accordance with my purpose so to do publicly proclaimed for the full period of one hundred days, from the day first above mentioned, order and designate as the States and parts of States wherein the people thereof respectively, are this day in rebellion against the United States, the following, to wit:
Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, (except the Parishes of St. Bernard, Plaquemines, Jefferson, St. John, St. Charles, St. James Ascension, Assumption, Terrebonne, Lafourche, St. Mary, St. Martin, and Orleans, including the City of New Orleans) Mississippi, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia, (except the forty-eight counties designated as West Virginia, and also the counties of Berkley, Accomac, Northampton, Elizabeth City, York, Princess Ann, and Norfolk, including the cities of Norfolk and Portsmouth), and which excepted parts, are for the present, left precisely as if this proclamation were not issued.
And by virtue of the power, and for the purpose aforesaid, I do order and declare that all persons held as slaves within said designated States, and parts of States, are, and henceforward shall be free; and that the Executive government of the United States, including the military and naval authorities thereof, will recognize and maintain the freedom of said persons.
And I hereby enjoin upon the people so declared to be free to abstain from all violence, unless in necessary self-defense; and I recommend to them that, in all cases when allowed, they labor faithfully for reasonable wages.
And I further declare and make known, that such persons of suitable condition, will be received into the armed service of the United States to garrison forts, positions, stations, and other places, and to man vessels of all sorts in said service.
And upon this act, sincerely believed to be an act of justice, warranted by the Constitution, upon military necessity, I invoke the considerate judgment of mankind, and the gracious favor of Almighty God.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
Done at the City of Washington, this first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty three, and of the Independence of the United States of America the eighty-seventh.
By the President: ABRAHAM LINCOLN
WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State

AFRICAN AMERICANS AND THE CIVIL WAR BIBLIOGRAPHY
Donaldson, G. (1991) The History of African-Americans in the Military. Malabar, FL: Krieger Pub. Co.
Foner, J. (1974) Blacks and the Military in American History. New York: A New Perspective Pub. Co.
Greene, R. (1974) Black Defenders of America: 1775-1973. Chicago: Johnson Publishing.
Langley, H. (1967) Social Reforms in the United States Navy: 1798-1862. Urbana, IL: University of IL Press.
Lanning. M. (1977) African-Am. Soldier from Crispus Attucks to Colin Powell. Secaucus, NJ: Carol Pub.
McConnell, R. (1968) Negro Troops of Antebellum Louisiana:.. Baton Rouge, LA: LA State Univ. Press.
Moebs, T. (1994) Black Soldiers - Black Sailors - Black Ink: Research Guide…….
Mullen, R. (1973) Blacks in America’s Wars. New York: Pathfinder.
Nalty, B. (1986) Strength for the Fight: A History of Black Americans in the Military. NY: Free Press.
Rogers, J. (1989) Africa’s Gift to America. St. Petersburg, FL: Helga Rogers Publishing.
Wilson, J. (1977) Black Phalanx: A History of the Negro Soldier ... 1775-1812, 1861-1865. NY: Arno Press.
Zinn, H. (1980) A People’s History of the United States. New York: HarperCollins Publishers



.



Black People... After 1492 - by Dr. Leroy Vaughn, MD, MBA. Historian

by DR. LEROY VAUGHN, MD, MBA, HISTORIAN is now available on amazon.com.


AFTER 1492

CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS
BLACK INDIANS
LORD DUNMORE’S ETHIOPIAN REGIMENT
CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS vs. BELGIUM KING LEOPOLD II
BLACKS AND THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR
AFRICAN WARRIOR QUEEN NZINGA


CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS

The original Haitians were called the Arawaks or Tainos. Christopher Columbus wrote in his log that the Arawaks were well built with good bodies and handsome features. He also reported that the Arawaks were remarkable for their hospitality and their belief in sharing. He said, "they offered to share with anyone and that when you ask for something they never say no." The Arawaks lived in village communes with a well-developed agriculture of corn, yams, and cassava. They had the ability to spin and weave, as well as being able to swim long distances. The Arawaks did not bear arms nor did they have prisons or prisoners. Columbus wrote that when the Santa Maria became shipwrecked, the Arawaks worked for hours to save the crew and cargo and that they were so honest that not one thing was missing. Arawak women were treated so well in early Haitian society that it startled the Spaniards. Columbus said that the Arawak men were of great intelligence because they could navigate all of their islands and give an amazingly precise account of everything.
The chief source, and on many matters the only source of information about what happened on the islands after Columbus arrived, was noted by a Catholic priest named Bartolome De Las Casas who lived during the time of Columbus. He transcribed Columbus's journal and wrote a multi-volume "History of the Indies." Las Casas says that Columbus returned to America on his second voyage with seventeen ships and with more than 1,200 heavily armed men with horses and attack dogs. Their aim was clearly to obtain as much gold and as many slaves as possible according to De Las Casas. Columbus went from island to island in the Caribbean, taking Arawaks as captives. He ordered everyone over the age of 14 to produce specific quantities of gold every three months, and if the Arawak could not produce this quota, Columbus then had his hands cut off; and left him to bleed to death.
If the Arawaks ever tried to escape, they were hunted down by the attack dogs and either hanged or burned alive. Within just two years, half of the three million Arawaks of Haiti died from murder, mutilation or suicide. Bishop De Las Casas reported that the Spaniards became so lazy that they refused to walk any distance; and either rode the backs of the Arawaks or were carried on hammocks by Arawaks who ran them in relays.
In other cases, the Spaniards had the Arawaks carry large leaves for their shade and had others to fan them with goose wings. Women were used as sex slaves and their children were murdered and then thrown into the sea. The Spaniards were so cruel, they thought nothing of cutting off slices of human flesh from the Arawaks just to test the sharpness of their blades. Bishop De Las Casas wrote, "My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature that now I tremble as I write.”
Christopher Columbus started the Trans-Atlantic slave trade by taking 500 of the healthiest men back to Spain to sell into slavery, and the proceeds from the sale helped to pay for his third voyage. The massive slave trade moving in the other direction, across the Atlantic from Africa to the Americas, was also begun in Haiti and was started by the son of Christopher Columbus in 1505 A.D. On his third voyage to Haiti, Queen Isabelle's new Governor, Francisco De Bobadilla, had Christopher Columbus and his two brothers arrested and sent back to Spain in chains as prisoners for their crimes against the Arawaks.
Would Columbus Day still be celebrated if the real history of Christopher Columbus were told from the viewpoint of his victims?
CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS BIBLIOGRAPHY
Blant, J. M. (1992) 1492: Debate on Colonialism, Eurocenterism & Hist. Trenton, NJ: African World Press
Bradley, M. (1992) The Columbus Conspiracy. Brooklyn, NY: A & B Books.
Carew, J. (1988) Fulcrums of Change. Trenton, NJ: African World Press.
Carew, J. (1994) Rape of Paradise. Brooklyn, NY: A & B Books
Cohen, J. M. (ed.) (1976) Native Population of the Americas in 1492. Madison: University of Wisc. Press.
Konig, H. (1991) Columbus: His Enterprise, Exploding the Myth. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Mahtown, P. (1992) Columbus: Sinking the Myth. New York: World View Forum.
Nash, G. (1970) Red, White, and Black: The People of Early America. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Williams, E. (1970) From Columbus to Castro. New York: Vintage Books.
Zinn, H. (1980) A People’s History of the United States. New York: Harper Perennial.


BLACK INDIANS

Black Indians, like other African Americans, have been treated by the writers of history as invisible. Two parallel institutions joined to create Black Indians: the seizure and mistreatment of Indians and their lands, and the enslavement of Africans. Today just about every African American family tree has an Indian branch. Europeans forcefully entered the African blood stream, but native Americans and Africans merged by choice, invitation and love. The two people discovered that they shared many vital views such as the importance of the family with children and the elderly being treasured. Africans and Native Americans both cherished there own trustworthiness and saw promises and treaties as bonds never to be broken. Religion was a daily part of cultural life, not merely practiced on Sundays. Both Africans and Native Americans found they shared a belief in economic cooperation rather than competition and rivalry. Indians taught Africans techniques in fishing and hunting, and Africans taught Indians techniques in tropical agriculture and working in agricultural labor groups. Further, Africans had a virtual immunity to European diseases such as small pox which wiped out large communities of Native Americans.
The first recorded alliance in early America occurred on Christmas Day, 1522, when African and Indian slaves on a plantation owned by Christopher Columbus's son, rebelled and murdered their White masters. These Indian and African slaves escaped into the woods together and were never recaptured. Another successful alliance occurred around 1600 when runaway slaves and friendly Indians formed the Republic of Palmares in northeastern Brazil, which successfully fought the Dutch and Portuguese for almost one hundred years. The Republic of Palmares grew to have one half mile long streets that were six feet wide and lined with hundreds of homes, churches, and shops. Its well-kept lands produced cereals and crops irrigated by African style streams. The Republic was ruled by a king named "Ganga-Zumba" which combined the African word for great with the Indian word for ruler.
The history of the Saramaka people of Surinam in South America started around 1685, when African and Native American slaves escaped and together formed a maroon society which fought with the Dutch for 80 years, until the Europeans abandoned their wars and sued for peace. Today the Saramakans total 20,000 people of mixed African-Indian ancestry.
By 1650, Mexico had a mixed African-Indian population of 100,000. Race mixing became so common in Mexico that the Spanish government passed laws prohibiting the two races from living together or marrying. In 1810, Vincente Guerrero of mixed African-Indian ancestry led the war for independence. In 1829, he became president of Mexico and immediately abolished slavery and the death sentence. He also began far reaching reforms including the construction of schools and libraries for the poor.
Escaped slaves became Spanish Florida's first settlers. They joined refugees from the Creek Nation and called themselves Seminoles, which means runaways. Intermixing became so common that they were soon called Black Seminoles. Africans taught the Indians rice cultivation and how to survive in the tropical terrain of Florida. Eventually the Black Seminoles had well-built homes and raised fine crops of corn, sweet potatoes, and vegetables. They even owned large herds of live stock. The Black Seminoles struck frequently against slave plantations and runaway slaves swelled their ranks. The U.S. government launched three massive war campaigns against the Seminole nation over a period of 40 years. The second war alone cost the U.S. government over $40 million and 1,500 soldiers. The Seminoles eventually signed a peace treaty with President Polk, which was violated in 1849, when the U.S. Attorney General ruled that Black Seminoles were still slaves under U.S. law.
Black Indian societies were so common in every east coast state that by 1812, state legislatures began to remove the tax exemption status of Indian land by claiming that the tribes were no longer Indian. A Moravian missionary visited the Nanticoke nation on Maryland's eastern shore to compile a vocabulary of their language and found they were speaking pure African Mandingo.
After the Civil War, very few Blacks ever left their Indian nation because this was the only society that could guarantee that they would never be brutalized nor lynched. If Europeans had followed the wonderfully unique model of harmony, honesty, friendship, and loyalty exhibited by the African and Indian populations in North and South America, the "new world" could truly have been the land of the free, the home of the brave, and a place where "all men are created equal."

BLACK INDIANS BIBLIOGRAPHY
Albers, J. (1975) Interaction of Color. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Amos, A. & Senter, T. (eds.) 1996) The Black Seminoles. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Bailey, L. (1966) Indian Slave Trade in the Southwest, Los Angeles: Westernlore.
Bemrose, J. (1966) Reminiscences of the Second Seminole War. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
Boxer, F. (1963) Race Relations in the Portuguese Colonial Empire 1415-1825. Oxford: Claredon Press.
Browser, F. (1974) The African Slave in Colonial Peru, 1524-1650. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Cohen, D. & Greene, J. (eds.) Neither Slave nor Free.. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.
Covington, J. (1982) Billy Bowlegs War: The Final Stand of the Seminoles.. Cluluota, FL. Mickler House.
Craven, W. (1971) White, Red, & Black: The 17th Cent. Virginian. Charlottesville: Univ. of Virginia Press.
Forbes, J. (1964) The Indian in America’s Past. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Forbes, J. (1993) Africans and Native Americans. Chicago: University of Illinois.
Katz, Loren (1986) Black Indians. New York Macmillan Publishing Co.
Nash, G. (1970) Red, White, and Black: The People of Early America. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.


LORD DUNMORE’S ETHIOPIAN REGIMENT

Few textbooks acknowledge the tremendous contribution made by Black soldiers during the Revolutionary War. An even lesser known fact is that Black slaves also fought for the British in an attempt to win their freedom. Many slaves in fact were deceived by the British into thinking that American slavery would end if the British army defeated the American Continental Army. The British actually imprinted the inscription “Liberty to Slaves” across the chest of each Black volunteer soldier.
In November 1775, John Murray, the Earl of Dunmore and British Governor of Virginia, decided that the Revolutionary War would no longer continue as the “White man’s war.” Both the American and British senior strategists had banned the use of Black soldiers, but Lord Dunmore saw the British as hopelessly outnumbered and was unwilling to overlook any potential support. He also hoped a slave insurrection would deprive the American army of much needed labor for building fortifications and disrupt the American economy since slave labor produced most of the cash crops. Lord Dunmore’s proclamation declared “all indentured servants, Negroes, or others: FREE, that are able and willing to bear arms…to his Majesty’s crown and dignity.”
Dunmore’s proclamation led Blacks to believe that the British were genuinely opposed to slavery. Since most American leaders such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson were prominent slaveholders, many Blacks saw the British opportunity as their only chance for freedom and consequently joined the British in large numbers. J. A. Rogers states that “5,000 joined Dunmore at Norfolk; 25,000 fled from their masters in South Carolina and nearly seven-eighths of the slaves in Georgia.” Nearly 2,000 slaves joined the British forces under General Cornwallis including numerous slaves from George Washington’s plantation. Thomas Jefferson declared that Virginia alone lost 30,000 and others estimate that as many as 100,000 slaves found their way to the British lines. One half of Dunmore’s troops that fought at Great Bridge on December 9, 1775 were runaway slaves.
Runaway slaves armed by the British are said to have terrorized the South. Many slaves overpowered their masters and handed their plantations over to the British. In the North, a strong garrison of Blacks known as the “Negro Fort,” defeated their former masters in a battle in the Bronx, New York City. Other Blacks joined the British Navy as seamen and pilots and successfully stole American ships and attacked numerous coastal towns. During the sieges of Charleston and Savannah, thousands of Black laborers built fortifications, while others in Virginia constructed two dams. Blacks also served as guides, spies, and intelligence agents for invading British armies. Ex-slave Thomas Johnson claimed to have conducted the detachment which surprised Colonial Washington at Monks Corner. The British even created a Black cavalry troop in 1782. British General William Phillips commented: “These Negroes have undoubtedly been of the greatest use.”
George Washington told Congress that “Dunmore’s appeal made him the most formidable enemy America has; and his strength will increase like a snowball by rolling and faster if some expedient cannot be hit upon to convince the slaves and servants of the impotency of his designs.” American slaveholders were still unwilling to arm their slaves until all other countermeasures were tried. Highway and river patrols were instituted to capture runaway slaves. Vigorous anti-British propaganda was circulated and southern slaves were frequently hidden in mines to avoid British capture. Several southern states even approved the death penalty for recaptured slaves, but nothing could stop the Black contributions to the British war effort. General Washington wrote Colonel Henry Lee on December 20, 1775: “We must use the Negroes or run the risk of loosing the war…success will depend on which side can arm the Negroes faster.”
The Continental Army finally agreed to accept African American volunteers (both slave and free) when the desertion rate of White soldiers began to reach enormous proportions. Washington complained: “The lack of patriotism is infinitely more to be dreaded than the whole of Great Britain assisted by Negro allies.” Once freedom was promised, African Americans showed the real “Spirit of ‘76” and joined the Continental Army in such massive numbers that General Schuyler wrote: “Is it consistent with the sons of freedom to trust their all to be defended by slaves?” On October 23, 1777, a British officer named Schlozer wrote: “The Negro can take the field instead of his master and therefore no regiment is to be seen in which there are not Negroes in abundance and among them are able-bodied, strong, and brave fellows.” Sir Henry Clinton wrote Lord Germaine, British Minister of State: “It is safe to say that but for the aid of the Negro, independence would not have been won.”
The American victory required the evacuation of all persons who had been loyal to the British. About 27,000 White Loyalists were relocated to Nova Scotia, Canada, but the majority of the Black Loyalists were betrayed by the British government which sold almost all of the former slaves back into slavery. Only the original 3,500 Black soldiers who became “Lord Dunmore’s Ethiopian Regiment” were relocated to Nova Scotia. Although they were promised land and provisions, most Blacks received neither and became beggars or cheap laborers for White Loyalists who were given farms as large as 200 acres by the government with free provisions for three years. When a London based abolition group headed by John Clarkson offered the Black Loyalists a new home in Africa, over 1,200 sailed in 15 crowded ships for Sierra Leone on January 15, 1792 where they founded the capital city of Freetown. The Nova Scotians eventually embraced and intermarried with the African community and provided the core of what became the national culture, language, and early leadership of Sierra Leone. However, more than two centuries later, their descendents still identify themselves as Nova Scotians and the direct descendents of “Lord Dunmore’s Ethiopian Regiment.”


LORD DUNMORE’S ETHIOPIAN REGIMENT BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aptheker, H. (1940) The Negro in the American Revolution. New York.
Armstrong, M. (1948) The Great Awakening in Nova Scotia, 1766-1809. Hartford.
Banton, M. (1957) West African City: A Study of Tribal Life in Freetown. London.
Beck, M. (1957) The Government of Nova Scotia. Toronto.
Bennett, L. (1988) Before the Mayflower. New York.
Butt-Thompson, F. (1926) Sierra Leone in History and Tradition. London.
Clairmont, D. (1970) Nova Scotian Blacks: An Historical and Structural Overview. Halifax.
Clendenen, C. & Duigan, P. (1964) Americans in Black Africa up to 1865. Stanford.
Crooks, J. (1903) A History of the Colony of Sierra Leone, West Africa. Dublin.
Davis, D. (1966) The Problem of Slavery in Western Culture. New York.
Elkins, S. (1959) Slavery: A Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life. New York.
Franklin, J. (1969) From Slavery to Freedom. New York.
Rogers, J. (1989) Africa’s Gift to America, St. Petersburg, FL.
Walker, J. (1992) The Black Loyalists. Toronto.


CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS vs. BELGIUM KING LEOPOLD II

In trying to determine the worse human rights violator over the past 500 years, two candidates far and away exceed all others. Adolph Hitler was not even close because he is only credited with killing six million people and his reign of terror only lasted about six years. Over a period of 25 years, Belgium King Leopold II was able to reduce the population of the Congo from 20 million to 10 million. Twenty five years after Christopher Columbus entered Haiti, the Arawak population was reduced to zero, that is, total annihilation or genocide.
In describing the exploits of Columbus, Dominican priest Bartolome de Las Casas wrote: “My eyes have seen these acts so foreign to human nature that I tremble as I write.” Famous American author Joseph Conrad called Leopold’s Congo: “The vilest scramble for loot that ever disfigured the history of human conscience.” Despite a death toll of holocaust dimensions, these men are not even mentioned in the standard litany of human horrors. Our children are given history books that describe Columbus as a heroic adventurer and an outstanding seaman. This heroic image is further perpetuated by Columbus Day celebrations and the fact that streets, schools, cities, and even countries have been named after him. King Leopold II enjoys an equally positive reputation. Belgium history describes him as a “philanthropic monarch who was much admired throughout Europe.” He is praised for investing a large portion of his personal fortune in public works projects to benefit both Europe and Africa. The current image of these two men could not be further from the truth! Both left behind a heritage of racism, greed, hunger, exploitation, and genocide. Leopold matched Columbus so closely in atrocities that one has to wonder whether they represent the same man reincarnated.
Both Columbus and Leopold were great salesmen and great liars. To help finance his second voyage, Columbus told the Spanish Monarch that “there are many wide rivers of which the majority contain gold…there are many spices, and great mines of gold and other metals.” Columbus was so convincing that Queen Isabella provided him with 17 ships and 1,200 men for his second voyage and promised him 10% of all the gold and precious metals he brought back. Leopold’s opportunity for salesmanship and lying came at the Berlin Conference (November 1884 - February 1885) where European countries met to decide how they would divide up Africa. Leopold begged for the Congo Basin and guaranteed the well being of the Congo’s native population. Leopold told the American delegation that “Belgium deserves the opportunity to prove to the world that it also was an imperial people, capable of dominating and enlightening others.” Since Leopold knew that the Belgium parliament and Belgium people had no interest in Africa, he essentially was arguing for a land mass 80 times the size of Belgium, which he would own personally.
Columbus and Leopold saw the profits from their new lands as virtually limitless if enough free labor were available. Both men immediately proceeded to institute slavery among the native population and set quotas for individual production. The favorite method of punishment by Columbus and Leopold for not meeting quotas was to cut off the hands.
Columbus ordered all persons 14 years old and older to collect a certain quantity of gold every three months. When they brought it, they were given copper tokens to hang around their necks. Arawaks found without copper tokens to hang around their necks had their hands cut off and bled to death. Leopold chose to set quotas for ivory and rubber for each village. When a village fell short of its quota, his soldiers brutally raided the village and cut off the victims’ right hands. Sean Kelly wrote: “Hands became a sort of currency in that soldiers were paid their bonuses on the basis of how many right hands they collected.”
Columbus and Leopold were exceptionally cruel to women and children. Both men allowed their soldiers to kidnap women as sex slaves, and they also held women and children as hostages to insure that the native men would not run away. Female hostages were usually poorly fed and large numbers died of starvation. Newborns also had a very high mortality rate because the mothers were too famished to provide nursing milk.
The Arawaks and Africans both fought back but were no match for the armor and swords of Columbus nor the guns and artillery of Leopold’s soldiers. Rebelling natives were treated exceedingly cruel by both oppressors. Although both men used hanging, Columbus preferred burning victims alive if possible or feeding them to the attack dogs. Leopold’s soldiers enjoyed summary executions followed by chopping off the victims’ heads and placing the heads on poles around their gardens. Guillaume Van Kerckhoven, a Leopold officer, cheerfully bragged to a missionary that he paid his Black soldiers five brass rods per human head they brought him during the course of any military operation he conducted. He said it was to stimulate their prowess in the face of the enemy.
A single man in both cases dedicated his life to exposing the atrocities of Columbus and Leopold to the world. Bartolome de Las Casas, a Dominican priest, was initially a friend of Columbus and helped transcribe his journals. However, he soon became a vehement critic of Spanish cruelty and published a two-volume book detailing Spanish torture. He estimates that three million Arawaks died between 1495 and 1508. Edmund Dene Morel, a trusted employee of the Liverpool shipping line, dedicated his life to exposing the atrocities of King Leopold. He single-handedly put this subject on the world’s front pages for more than a decade, which resulted in worldwide protest rallies. Morel mobilized everyone from Booker T. Washington to the Archbishop of Canterbury to join his cause. He even went to the White House insisting to President Theodore Roosevelt that the United States had a special responsibility to do something about the Congo since the U.S. helped Leopold at the Berlin Conference. Morel’s unrelenting efforts resulted in western powers forcing King Leopold to sell the Congo to Belgium in 1908.
Despite responsibility for death tolls of holocaust dimensions, neither Christopher Columbus nor King Leopold II was convicted or imprisoned for any crimes. Both men lived a full life and died exceptionally rich. Columbus spent his last years living in a mansion in Valladolid with an annual income of $60,000 from his Hispaniola sugar plantations (a fortune in the 1500s). Leopold died in 1909 with a personal fortune (produced by the Congo’s ivory and rubber) of well over a billion dollars in today’s currency.
In order to prevent the human atrocities of Columbus and Leopold from ever reoccurring, it might be prudent to adopt the current philosophy regarding Adolph Hitler; that is, constant reminders of the holocausts in newspapers, magazines, books, radio, television, and even holocaust museums followed by the statement: “Never Again.”

CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS VS BELGIUM KING LEOPOLD II BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anstey, R. (1966) King Leopold’s Legacy: Congo Under Belgian Rule 1908-1960. London: Oxford Univ. Pr.
Bauer, L. (1935) Leopold the Unloved: King of the Belgians and of Wealth. Boston: Little, Brown, and Co.
Blant, J. M. (1992) 1492: Debate on Colonialism, Eurocenterism and Hist. Trenton, NJ: African World Pr.
Bradley, M. (1992) The Columbus Conspiracy. Brooklyn, NY: A & B Books.
Carew, J. (1994) Rape of Paradise. Brooklyn, NY: A & B Books.
Cohen, J. M. (ed.) (1969) Christopher Columbus: The Four Voyages. London: Penguin Books.
De Las Casas, B. (1971) History of the Indies. New York: Harper and Row.
Emerson, B. (1979) Leopold II of the Belgiums: King of Colonialism. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
Fetter, B. (1983) Colonial Rule and Regional Imbalance in Central Africa. Boulder, Co: Westview Press.
Gann, L. & Duignan, P. (1979) Rulers of Belgium Africa 1884 - 1914. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hochschild, A. (1998) King Leopold’s Ghost. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co.

BLACKS AND THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR

African American participation was enormous during the events leading to American Independence, but these contributions are seldom mentioned in contemporary history books. For example, Crispus Attucks, a Black man and probably an escaped slave, was the first person killed in Boston when tensions between British soldiers and an angry crowd resulted in the death of five people. March 5, 1770 was initially called the day of the Boston Massacre but the name was soon changed to Crispus Attucks Day. Crispus Attucks Day remained the chief American anniversary until independence was won and it was replaced by July 4th. John Adams, our second president, called March 5, 1770 the most important event in American history. On October 13, 1888 a monument was erected on Boston Common called the Crispus Attucks Memorial.
British resentment increased dramatically after the Boston Massacre until things finally exploded on April 19, 1775, into the Revolutionary War. At least a dozen Black militiamen were among those firing the “shots heard round the world” at Lexington on April 19th. One of the first Americans to fall was a Black minuteman named Prince Estabrook. The second major clash was fought at Bunker Hill on June 17th, where two African Americans again became great heroes. Peter Salem became famous after he shot and killed Major Pitcairn, the British commander. Salem Poor so distinguished himself in this same battle that 13 officers including his commander, Colonel Brewer, recommended him for official recognition to the General Court of Massachusetts.
However, less than 6 months after Lexington and the Battle of Bunker Hill, a pattern of exclusion of Blacks from the new nation’s military units had begun to develop. Southern slave owners protested vehemently against the use of Black people in the Revolutionary War including George Washington who himself was a slave owner. Finally, on October 8, 1775, Continental Army headquarters bowed to southern pressure and issued a decree excluding all African Americans from service in Continental units.
As the war dragged on and the number of White deserters became enormous, Washington complained that “the lack of patriotism is infinitely more to be dreaded than the whole British Army.” Washington changed his mind drastically after his defeat by the British at New York, when he was greatly outnumbered. He then partitioned the new government to welcome all able-bodied men into the Continental Army whether Black or White, slave or free. Accordingly, on March 14, 1779, Alexander recommended that South Carolina and Georgia “take measures for raising 3,000 able-bodied Negroes who would receive no pay but would be emancipated at the end of the war.” White slave masters of the North and South who didn’t want to risk their lives or their sons’ lives were allowed to send slaves to take their place. There were soon so many Black soldiers that General Schuyler wrote “is it consistent with the sons of freedom to trust their ALL to be defended by slaves?” Nineteenth century American historian, Ben J. Lossing, wrote that “as the war went on, and the ranks of the army grew thinner, an increasing number of Negroes took the place of the Whites, until it began to appear that Ethiopia as well as America was in arms.” Baron Von Clausen stated that of the 20,000 men he saw with Washington in January, 1781, “5,000 were Negroes.”
It is indisputable that African Americans provided the balance of power that brought America independence. They distinguished themselves in every possible manner from combat soldier to support personnel who built virtually every fortification and new building from Vermont to South Carolina. Sir Henry Clinton wrote Lord Germaine, British Minister of State, “it is safe to say that but for the aid of the Negro, independence would not have been won.” All Black regiments as well as individual soldiers who distinguished themselves were mentioned by the hundreds. Rhode Island, with a small population and two thirds of its territory occupied by the British, became the first colony to authorize the enlistment of all slave regiments. At the battle of Rhode Island, August 27, 1778, a regiment of 226 slaves repelled a force of 6,000 British who charged them three times in an attempt to dislodge them from a strategic valley. Dr. Harris wrote “they preserved our army from capture and helped gain our liberty.” General Lafayette called this “the best action of the whole war.”
A company of Blacks from Boston called the “Bucks of America” rendered such valuable service that John Hancock gave them a special flag and honored them with a special affair at Boston. George Bancroft wrote of the Battle of Monmouth in New Jersey in 1778, “may history record that more than 700 Black men offered their lives for their country and fought side by side with Whites.” Commander Nathaniel Shaler thought so highly of the Black soldiers who fought under him that he sent a letter to Governor Thompkins stating that “they ought to be registered in the book of fame and remembered as long as bravery is considered a virtue.”
In general, the contributions of Black Americans who had fought to bring freedom to America were not forgotten. Virtually all of the slaves who fought in the war received their freedom after the war. In fact, the institution of slavery did not even last throughout the war in most northern states. In 1777, Vermont became the first state to abolish slavery. Pennsylvania followed in 1780, and Massachusetts in 1783. Rhode Island freed its slaves in 1784. Even Virginia passed a law freeing all slaves who participated in the war. Unfortunately, the contributions of African Americans were soon forgotten in the South, where the vast majority of them lived, and the institution of slavery soon returned to business as usual.

First American Revolutionary War Announcement
(F REPLACED WITH MODERN S) …
HOURS TO THE GATES OF THIS CITY MANY THOUSANDS OF OUR BRAVE BRETHREN IN THE COUNTRY, DEEPLY AFFECTED WITH OUR DISTRESSES, AND TO WHOM WE ARE GREATLY OBLIGED ON THIS OCCASION – NO ONE KNOWS WHERE THIS WOULD HAVE ENDED, AND WHAT IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES EVEN TO THE WHOLE BRITISH EMPIRE MIGHT HAVE FOLLOWED, WHICH OUR MODERATION & LOYALTY UPON SO TRYING AN OCCASION, AND OUR FAITH IN THE COMMANDER’S ASSURANCES HAVE HAPPILY PREVENTED.
LAST THURSDAY,
AGREEABLE TO A GENERAL REQUEST OF THE INHABITANTS, AND BY THE CONSENT OF PARENTS AND FRIENDS, WERE CARRIED TO THEIR GRAVE IN SUCCESSION,
THE BODIES OF SAMUEL GRAY, SAMUEL MAVERICK, JAMES CALDWELL, AND CRISPUS ATTUCKS, THE UNHAPPY VICTIMS WHO FELL IN THE BLOODY MASSACRE OF THE MONDAY EVENING PRECEDING !
ON THIS OCCASION MOST OF THE SHOPS IN TOWN WERE SHUT, ALL THE BELLS WERE ORDERED TO TOLL A SOLEMN PEAL,
AS WERE ALSO THOSE IN THE NEIGHBORING TOWNS OF CHARLESTON ROXBURY, &C. THE PROCESSION BEGAN
TO MOVE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF
4 AND 5 IN THE AFTERNOON ; TWO OF THE UNFORTUNATE SUFFERS, VIZ. MEFF. JAMES CALDWELL AND CRISPUS ATTUCKS, WHO WERE STRANGERS, BORNE FROM FANEUIL-HALL,

BLACKS AND THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aptheker, H. (1974) Documentary History of the Negro People in the US. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel Press.
Bailyn, B. & Garrett, N. (eds.) (1965) Pamphlets of the Am. Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Pr.
Becker C. (1958) Declaration of Independence: A Study in the History of Political Ideas. NY: Random House.
Degler, C. (1970) Out of Our Past. New York: Harper and Row.
Hill, C. (1964) Puritanism and Revolution. New York: Schocken.
Kurtz, S. & Hutson, J. (eds.) Essays on the American Revolution. Chapel Hill: University of NC
Lynd, S. (1967) Class Conflict, Slavery, and the Constitution. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Maier, P. (1972) From Resistance to Revolution.., 1765-1776. New York: Knopf.
Shy, J. (1976) A People Numerous & Armed.. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, P. (1976) A New Age Now Begins: A People’s History of the Am. Revolution. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Young, A. (ed.) (1976) The American Revolution…DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Press.
Zinn, H. (1980) A People’s History of the United States. New York: Harper Perennial.

AFRICAN WARRIOR QUEEN NZINGA

Nzinga (1582-1663) became queen of what is now called Angola in 1623 and dedicated her entire life to fighting the Portuguese to prevent the enslavement of her people. She proved to be a cunning rival to the Portuguese and became famous for her intelligence, bravery, and brilliant military strategies, which were imitated for centuries during struggles for independence throughout Africa.
In the 16th century, the Portuguese stake in the slave trade was threatened by England, France, and the Dutch. This caused the Portuguese to transfer their slave-trading activities southward to the Congo and to Southwest Africa. Their most stubborn opposition, as they entered the final phase of the conquest of Angola, came from a queen who became a legendary head of state and military leader with few peers in world history.
Nzinga was one of five children born to her powerful father, King (or ngola) Kiluanji of Ndongo - which the Portuguese called Angola after the word for king: ngola. The Mbundu tribe of King Kiluanji initially welcomed the Portuguese as trading partners. In fact, King Kiluanji became wealthy and powerful enough through Portuguese trading that he conquered all the surrounding territories.
Subsequently, disputes over these new territories created the rift that eventually ended the Portuguese alliance. King Kiluanji was such a great fighter that he was able to repel the early Portuguese invasions of the border territories. When Kiluanji died, his eldest son Mbandi declared himself king. Mbandi, however, he greatly feared the Portuguese guns and canons and when they advanced, he fled to an island on the Cuanza River and asked his sister Nzinga to negotiate a peace treaty with the Portuguese governor. The arrogant Portuguese had been appointing governors over Angola for over forty years without having control.
Nzinga’s 1622 negotiating conference with the new governor, Joao Correa DeSouza, has become a legend in the history of Africa’s confrontation with Europe. Despite the fact that her brother had surrendered everything to the Portuguese, Nzinga arrived as a royal negotiator rather than a humble conquered messenger. When the governor only provided one chair for himself, she summoned one of her women, who provided a royal carpet and then fell to her hands and knees to become a human seat. When Governor DeSouza entered, he found himself already out maneuvered. When the governor asked for the release of all Portuguese war prisoners, Nzinga smilingly agreed, provided all her Mbundu people who had been carried off to Brazil and elsewhere were brought back in exchange. This condition was eventually reduced to returning Portuguese prisoners in exchange for allowing her brother, King Mbandi, to remain ruler of an independent Ndongo kingdom and withdrawing the Portuguese army. Nzinga made it clear she would only negotiate a treaty on equal terms.
Probably as part of a private agreement intended to reinforce the treaty, Nzinga stayed in town and became baptized as “Anna” in the Christian faith. Such a move was more political than religious because Nzinga knew that even her father had opposed the mass conversion to Christianity of the Mbundu. She knew that the Jesuit priests ran the slave trade for the Portuguese. They sprinkled “Holy Water” while officiating at daily mass baptisms on the docks, where lines of captives shuffled into slave ships with such names as “Jesus” and “John the Baptist.” Nzinga also knew that her status as a “Christian” ally of Portugal would entitle her people to favored status. She was even politically astute enough to allow herself the full Christian name of Dona Anna DeSouza in order to strengthen her links with the governor.
Shortly after negotiating with Nzinga, Governor DeSouza was replaced by a new governor after quarreling with the Jesuit priests. The new governor promptly broke all the treaty agreements. Nzinga demanded that her brother, King Mbandi, declare war on the Portuguese. Unfortunately, cowardly King Mbandi had no such intentions and went to the Portuguese asking for protection against Nzinga and to re-enforce his authority over his own people. Nzinga, now determined to do away with this treacherous weakling, had him killed and then promptly declared war on the Portuguese herself. She initially trained an all female army which repeatedly defeated the Portuguese using guerilla style tactics. She then recruited neighboring tribes and also allied with the Dutch. The Dutch military attaché who accompanied her reported that the people loved Nzinga so much that everyone fell to their knees and kissed the ground as she approached. He believed that all were willing to die under her leadership. The Portuguese retreated to their strongholds and forts on the coast giving the Dutch threat as an excuse and not the threat of being annihilated by the queen’s forces. Nzinga’s main goal was always to end the enslavement of her people. She even sent word throughout Africa in 1624, that any slave who could make it to her territory was henceforth and forever free. This act alone should make Nzinga one of the greatest women in history because there was no other place on the continent of Africa that offered such freedom.
The Portuguese responded to this threat by calling in a massive force of men and artillery from their colony of Brazil. Nzinga’s guerilla warfare tactics for resisting the well armed Portuguese soldiers have been much admired and even imitated successfully in this century. Since the Portuguese used large numbers of Black soldiers, she became the first Black leader and most successful to carefully organize efforts to undermine and destroy the effective employment of Black soldiers by Whites. She instructed her soldiers to infiltrate the Portuguese by allowing themselves to become recruited by Portuguese agents. Once members of the Portuguese military, her soldiers would encourage rebellion and desertion by the Black troops which frequently resulted in whole companies of Portuguese soldiers joining Nzinga along with much needed guns and ammunition. This quiet and effective work of Nzinga’s agents among the Black troops of Portugal is one of the most glorious, yet unsung, pages of African history. The Portuguese generals frequently complained that they never knew which Black soldier was friend or foe.
When the massive Portuguese manpower and firepower began to gain the upper hand, she sent word throughout Angola that she had died in order to stop the Portuguese offensive. While pretending to have died in Angola, Nzinga moved east to the neighboring country of Matamba where she defeated the ruling queen and created a new land for herself, her people, and all escaped slaves. She consolidated her power in Matamba and then began sending out war parties from Matamba to attack any settlement or tribe that had aided the Portuguese. In 1629 the Portuguese stood shocked when Queen Nzinga “burst upon them from the grave” recapturing large segments of her own country. She was now queen of both Matamba and Ndongo and redoubled her efforts against slavery by dealing ruthlessly with any Black chief found participating in the slave trade.
Nzinga never stopped resisting the powerful Portuguese even as she approached her 80th birthday. She was called the “Black Terror” by the Portuguese and was clearly the greatest adversary and military strategist that ever confronted the armed forces of Portugal. Her tactics kept the Portuguese commanders in confusion and dismay and her constant aim was never less than the total destruction of the slave trade. The long guerilla campaign that led to Angola independence 300 years later was continuously inspired by the queen who never surrendered.
AFRICAN WARRIOR QUEEN NZINGA BIBLIOGRAPHY
Hyman, M. (1994) Blacks Before America. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.
Jackson, J. (1970) Introduction to African Civilization. New York: Carol Publishing Group.
Robinson, C. & Battle, R. (1987) The Journey of the Songhai People. Philadelphia: Farmer Press.
Rogers, J. (1972) World’s Great Men of Color. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
Sweetman, D. (1971) Queen Nzinga. London: Longman.
Sweetman, D. (1984) Women Leaders in African History. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
Van Sertima, I. (1988) Black Women in Antiquity. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Williams, C. (1987) The Destruction of Black Civilization. Chicago: Third World Press.
Woodson, C. (1969) African Heroes and Heroines. Washington, DC: The Associated Publishers Inc.